JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the case diary. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is holding licence of deed-writer which is in currency. There is no evidence against him to connect him with the crime. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor does not dispute this position. 4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing anything on the merit of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the application filed by the petitioner for anticipatory bail under Section 438, Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner by the investigating officer/SHO in connection with FIR No. 38/2010, Police Station Khimada (District Pali), the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- and furnishes two sureties for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/SHO on the following conditions. 1. that he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required. 2. that he shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and, 3. that he shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. Application Allowed. *******