Hon'ble SINGH, J.—Submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is that the compensation awarded in the case of the appellants No.1 Bijendra Singh is not adequate. 2. Learned counsel further submits that the learned Tribunal has erred in holding that there were only two grievous injuries, whereas in the facts and circumstances of the case, there are four grievous injuries. 3. I find from the judgment of the learned Tribunal that the learned Tribunal has taken into account the injury report, which was produced during trial and on the basis of the said injury report, which is exhibited and produced the learned Tribunal has come to the conclusion that the appellant received only two grievous injuries. 4. So far as the injury report available with the appellants is concerned on the basis of which it is contended that the appellant received four grievous injuries, same has not been produced during trial and marked as Exhibit. 5. In the facts and circumstances, no case for interference is made out. 6. The case of the co-appellant No.2 Lakhapati @ Mahbood is also identical as the injury report on which the learned counsel for the appellants seeks to rely has not been exhibited during trial, as such no case is made out for interference. 7. The miscellaneous appeal is accordingly dismissed summarily.