Judgment :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 11.11.2009, is directed to be disposed of by the second respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first and the second respondents, had no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 11.11.2009, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to the third respondent, as well as to the other persons concerned, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The petitioner isdirected to furnish to the second respondent a copy of the representation, dated 11.11.2009, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.