JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is nothing to do with the occurrence. In fact, forged appointment letters were issued by Mr ML Sharma. Co-accused has been granted bail. So far as petitioner is concerned, she is relative of Mr Mahendra Sharma thus has been made an accused in this case. Looking to the aforesaid, petitioner may be granted bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. After considering rival submissions of the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, which may otherwise affect outcome of the trial, looking to the facts of this case, I am of the view that petitioner deserves to be enlarged on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application is accepted and it is directed that accused-petitioner namely; Renu Sharma may be enlarged on bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 192/2010 registered at Police Station - Shivdaspura, Jaipur for offence under Section/s 420, 465, 468, 120-B IPC provided, she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for her appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.Bail application allowed. *******