JUDGMENT 1. - This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order of the Juvenile Justice Board dated 24.5.2010 as also the order dated 26.5.2010 passed by learned Court of Sessions. 2. By the first order, the Juvenile Justice Board has rejected the application of the petitioner, who is a juvenile, under section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act thereby denying him benefit of bail pending trial. The appeal of the petitioner was also rejected by the learned Court of Sessions, Dausa upholding that order. 3. Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that only reason assigned by the learned Board is that if the petitioner is released on bail, it might endanger his life because he in that event might come in contact with other criminals and that there are many other co-accused, whose arrest in the present case has yet not been made. Learned counsel submitted that learned Court of Sessions also erred in law in following that line of reasoning, whereas the fact is that there was absolutely no basis to say that if is released on bail, his safety would be jeopardised and that he would come in contact with other criminals. 4. This Court has negatived such reasoning by allowing the revision petition no.632/2010 filed at the instance of Krishna Kant Meena, who is also a juvenile by order dated 1.10.2010. The case of the petitioner is exactly similar with that of Krishna Kant as there being no difference whatsoever. 5. It was argued that this Court allowed the revision petition filed by Krishna Kant Meena stating that no cogent reasons have been assigned by the Court for releasing the juvenile on bail. 6. Shri Jinendra Jain, learned PP although opposed the revision petition but was unable to show any distinction between the case of the petitioner and that of the another co-accused Krishna Kant Meena, who too is a Juvenile and was granted benefit of bail. 7. In the result, the revision petition is allowed. The impugned orders dated 24.5.2010 and 26.5.2010 are quashed and set aside and Jitendra be released on bail provided his father Shri Trilok Chand shall submit bail bond in the amount of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 7. In the result, the revision petition is allowed. The impugned orders dated 24.5.2010 and 26.5.2010 are quashed and set aside and Jitendra be released on bail provided his father Shri Trilok Chand shall submit bail bond in the amount of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties in the amount of Rs. 12,500/- each to the satisfaction of the Principle Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Dausa with the stipulation that he will produce the juvenile before the Court on all dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.Revision allowed. *******