JUDGMENT Ram Chand Gupta, J. (Oral):- This order will dispose of both the aforementioned petitions bearing Crl.M.Nos.M-17222 and 17281 of 2010, filed by Jagdev Singh, Inderjit Kaur and Rajwinder Singh alias Raj Brar and Sukhwant Kaur, respectively, under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to them in case FIR No.92, dated 30.4.2010, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Khanna, District Ludhiana. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone through the whole record carefully. 3. Brief allegations against petitioners-accused are that Jagtar Singh Panag, co-accused, husband of complainant Karanjit Kaur had gone abroad on forged and fabricated passport. She filed a complaint against her husband before the Court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khanna, however, the accused evaded their arrest. They were declared proclaimed offenders. On the basis of the said forged document, Jagtar Singh used to visit India. In enquiry it came out that passport No.A031283 is in the name of Gurvinder Singh, brother-in-law of Sukhwant Kaur, the sister of Jagtar Singh. Jagtar Singh contracted the second marriage with Baljit Kaur in connivance with his sister Sukhwant Kaur, wife of Prem Singh by impersonating himself as Gurvinder Singh. However, Gurvinder Singh had already expired on 10.6.1996 and the passport was forged after the death of Gurvinder Singh in connivance with Santokh Kaur, real sister of Jagtar Singh. All the accused committed the offence in connivance with each other. In the enquiry held by Deputy Superintendent of Police, it came out that one of the petitioners, namely,Inderjit Kaur was also working as an agent in the Passport office at Chandigarh and helped in getting the forged passport for Jagtar Singh. 4. Hence, in view of the serious allegations against the petitioners, it is not such a case in which extraordinary relief of anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners-accused. Rather, custodial interrogation of the petitioners-accused is necessary. 5. Hence, in view of these facts, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition filed by petitioners Jagdev Singh, Inderjit Kaur, Rajwinder Singh alias Raj Brar and Sukhwant Kaur for grant of anticipatory bail is, hereby, dismissed being devoid of any merit. ------------