Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2010 DIGILAW 2127 (MAD)

Meerangani v. The Managing Director, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board Another

2010-05-02

M.JAICHANDREN

body2010
Judgment :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents had stated that the respondents have no objection for this Court directing the respondents to furnish the application, as prayed for by the petitioner. 3. In view of the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the first respondent is directed to furnish the application, as prayed for by the petitioner, on the petitioner paying the necessary charges. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.