Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2010 DIGILAW 2223 (MAD)

D. Sivakolundu v. The District Collector (RDD) Cuddalore, Cuddalore District. & Another

2010-06-01

M.JAICHANDREN

body2010
Judgment : Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 23.10.2005, is directed to be disposed of by the first respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 23.10.2005, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the second respondent, as well as to the other persons concerned, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the respondent a copy of the representation, dated 23.10.2005, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.