JUDGEMENT SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA, J. 1. The Appellants abovenamed have preferred this appeal against the Judgment of conviction and/Order of sentence dated 30th January, 2003 passed in Sessions Case No. 408 of 1998 by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Banka whereby and whereunder the Appellants have been found guilty for the offence under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly, they have been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous Imprisonment for life. 2. Shortly stated, the Prosecution case as disclosed from the written report (Exh. 1) is that at about 6.30 P.M. on 7th July, 1997 five persons, namely, the informant Mrigendra Kumar Singh @ Pappu Singh (P.W.3), Biplav Kumar Singh (since deceased) and Ramjee Kumar Yadav (P.W.13) on one Kawasaki Motorcycle and two on another Rajdoot Motorcycle, namely, Shishupal Singh (P.W.1) and Sankar Kumar Singh (since deceased) were returning after making advance payment to Bishundeo and Johari Pandit for fish. At that very time six unknown criminals variously armed with revolver, dagger, iron rod, chain, bow and arrow and bomb, etc., were standing at Spillway bridge near Badua Dam. The motorcyclist had to stop the vehicle because of the obstruction and at that very time these Appellants and other criminals took away money, watch, ring, etc., from the possession of the informant and others. Thereafter, the accused persons tide their legs and hands on their back with the assistance of the lungi of the informant and his companions. In the meanwhile, three more persons including Pankaj Bhagat (since deceased) with two of his relatives came on their scooter and they were also robbed of their belongings by the miscreants. Soon thereafter, a tractor of Saloni Murmu loaded with sand being driven by P.W.6 Sukar Pandit along with labourers Mahesh Pandit (P.W.4), Subhash Sao (P.W.5), Dasrath Pandit (P.W.7) and Raj Kumar Saw (P.W.8) arrived and those persons were also robbed of their belongings. At the behest of Sardar of the gang of the criminals, several persons were thrown and pushed down into the water of Badua Dam one after another by tying their hands or arms behind their back as a result thereof seven persons died. Some of the persons who were thrown in the dam namely, informant (P.W.3), Shishupal Singh (P.W.1) and Ramjee Yadav (P.W.13) any how managed to save themselves from drowning. Some of the persons who were thrown in the dam namely, informant (P.W.3), Shishupal Singh (P.W.1) and Ramjee Yadav (P.W.13) any how managed to save themselves from drowning. They rushed to the nearby village Biji Khorwa and reported about the occurrence and Police was informed at 2.00 A.M. on 8th July, 1997 which was situated at 8 kilometers away from Spillway Bridge Badua Dam. Formal FIR was drawn and investigation was taken up. After investigation, chargesheet was submitted against eight accused persons including the Appellants. Cognizance was taken and the case was committed to the Court of Sessions where the charge was framed for the offence under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code for conjointly committing dacoity and murder of several persons during the Commission of dacoity. The Appellants have not pleaded guilty and preferred to face trial. 3. In Order to prove the case, the Prosecution has examined 19 witnesses and no witness was examined on behalf of the accused persons. From the trend of cross-examination, it appears that the defence of the Appellants was of false implication at the behest of Police. Further defence was that on the basis of such scanty evidence on the means of identification there was no occasion for the Court to convict them. 4. It is to be seen here as to whether the Judgment passed by the learned Court below is correct or not and as to whether the Prosecution has been able to prove the charge against the Appellants beyond all reasonable doubts or not. 5. The Prosecution has examined 19 witnesses in course of trial. P.W.19 is a formal witness. Six witnesses are official witnesses. P.W.11 is Sub-Inspector of Police who has assisted the investigating officer (who has not been examined) and he has prepared seven inquest reports regarding seven dead bodies recovered from Badua Dam which were marked as Exh. 3 to 3/F and signatures of witnesses on inquest reports are marked as Exh. 2 series. Other official witnesses, namely, P.W.16 Subhash Chandra Shrivastava and P.W.18 Sifat Ahmad are the Judicial Magistrates. They have conducted the test identification parade and prepared the Test Identification Chart (Exh. 5). P.W.14 Dr. Bishwanath Prasad and P.W.15 Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh are the two doctors who have examined on behalf of the Prosecution. The Civil Surgeon, Banka has constituted the Medical Board comprising of three doctors. P.W.14 Dr. They have conducted the test identification parade and prepared the Test Identification Chart (Exh. 5). P.W.14 Dr. Bishwanath Prasad and P.W.15 Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh are the two doctors who have examined on behalf of the Prosecution. The Civil Surgeon, Banka has constituted the Medical Board comprising of three doctors. P.W.14 Dr. Bishwanath Prasad was the Chairman of the Medical Board. Besides P.W.15, Dr. Uday Shankar Bhagat (not examined) was one of the members. Medical opinion regarding the seven post mortem reports was brought on the record by the P.W.14. Autopsy of seven dead bodies were conducted on 9th July, 1997 after recovery of the dead bodies and were brought for postmortem examination. Exh. 4 is the postmortem examination report of Pankaj Bhagat @ Pankaj Kumar Bhagat (aged 30 years). Exh. 4/1 is the postmortem examination report of Shankar Kumar Singh (aged 30 years). Exh. 4/2 is the postmortem examination report of Krishan Kumar (aged 20 years). Whereas Exh. 4/3 is the postmortem examination report of Biplav Kumar Singh (aged 26 years). Exh. 4/4 is the postmortem examination report of Om Prakash Gupta (aged 32 years) and Exh. 4/5 is the postmortem examination report of Lalan Gupta (aged 32 years). Exh. 4/6 is the postmortem examination report of unknown and uncircumcised dead body of a male (aged 32 years). In all the cases, death was due to drowning and it was within time span of 24 hours to 48 hours. 6. Sixth official witness P.W.17 is the Sub-Inspector of Police who was the member of the raiding party and he has recovered one stolen motorcycle Bajaj Kawasaki having Registration No. BR 10-6084 from the house of one of the accused which was marked as Exh. 7 and it was signed by the witnesses (Exh. 6 series). The driver of the tractor which was carrying sand and labourers has been examined. The labourers who were going through the tractor are P.W.4 Mahesh Pandit, P.W.5 Subhash Sao, P.W.7 Dasrath Pandit, P.W.8 Raj Kumar Sao and driver of the tractor is P.W.6. All the witnesses have supported the factum of occurrence but, P.W.4 is the witness of identification of these Appellants who were put on test identification parade on 4th September, 1997 by P.W.16 vide Test Identification Chart (Exh. 5). All the witnesses have supported the factum of occurrence but, P.W.4 is the witness of identification of these Appellants who were put on test identification parade on 4th September, 1997 by P.W.16 vide Test Identification Chart (Exh. 5). P.W.18 is the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class has also held test identification parade on 29th September, 1997 and he has recorded the statements of eight witnesses under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. on the Order of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka. Out of those 8 witnesses P.Ws. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 have been examined in course of trial and remaining three witnesses who have given their statements under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, namely, Siya Ram Singh, Ram Manjhi and Dasrath Bhagat were not examined in course of trial. Three witnesses, namely, P.W.1 Shishupal Singh, P.W.3 Mrigendra Kumar Singh @ Pappu Singh-informant and P.W.4 Mahesh Pandit are the witnesses of the occurrence and identification. 7. P.W.3 in his evidence has stated that on 7th July, 1997 possibly Monday at about 6.00 to 7.00 P.M. he was at the spillway bridge. At that time, five more persons were with him and they were on two motorcycles. One was Kawasaki Motorcycle upon which the informant along with Biplav Kumar Singh and Ramjee Yadav were present while on another Rajdoot motorcycle Shishupal Singh and Santosh Singh @ Shankar Singh were traveling. They were returning after making advance to fisherman and when they reached at the spillway bridge then six miscreants variously armed intercepted them. One of the criminals was having a pistol of six rounds, the second was having a bomb and third was having iron rod, fourth was armed with bow and arrow. Fifth was having dagger and sixth was having iron chain. The informant and other persons were surrounded from all the sides by the criminals who started snatching their articles. In course of loot, the criminals snatched watches, ring and cash. After looting the properties, one of the victims, Ramjee Yadav, was forced to part with his lungi which was torn in pieces and were utilised in tying the hands by putting it behind the body. The legs were also tied. One person was the Sardar of the gang and was dictating the criminals. His dictates were being followed by other criminals. The legs were also tied. One person was the Sardar of the gang and was dictating the criminals. His dictates were being followed by other criminals. In the meanwhile, three more persons on a scooter arrived there, out of whom one Pankaj Bhagat was identified. He was also looted away his belongings and thereafter, their legs and hands were also tied. At the behest of the Sardar, namely, the leader of the criminals other criminals started throwing all the persons into the water of the dam for killing. While the informant was standing then he was pushed into water where the depth of water was 30-40 feet. The miscreants took away Biplav Kumar Singh for throwing him into water and when he states that he would not be able to walk because his legs were tied then Sardar ordered to untie the legs and the miscreants obeyed the same by opening the rope around his legs and on the order of the Sardar the miscreants started throwing the persons one by one into the water. Firstly, Biplav Kumar Singh was thrown, thereafter, the informant was thrown. When others were waiting for being thrown and were to be thrown in the water then one tractor arrived there. The persons upon the tractor were over powered and the miscreants asked about the owner of the tractor. When the driver replied that the tractor was of Saloni Murmu then the four labourers and drivers were assaulted. When the informant was being pushed into the water he balanced himself and ultimately when he was thrown then he came near the pillar of the bridge by swimming. There was a wall in the middle of the pillar just like a platform and the informant climbed upon it. Sometimes thereafter, Ramjee Yadav also climbed upon the platform. Shishupal Singh also reached up to the platform but, Biplav Kumar Singh was not seen anywhere. After all the persons were thrown in the water, the informant came to know through Shishupal Singh and Ramjee Yadav that all the persons have been thrown in the water. While the informant and others were at the platform in the river he noticed the departure of the tractor. The informant waited there but, none came and then the informant came to Biji Khorwa after swimming in the dam and narrated the incidents to the villagers after awakening them from their sleep. While the informant and others were at the platform in the river he noticed the departure of the tractor. The informant waited there but, none came and then the informant came to Biji Khorwa after swimming in the dam and narrated the incidents to the villagers after awakening them from their sleep. Villagers assembled and in the meanwhile SDO, Biji Khorwa was spotted who was coming. His help was sought for informing the Police. Shishupal Singh and Ramjee Yadav were taken out from the water by the villagers and they were taken to village Biji Khorwa. Informant and other victims received no help from S.D.O., Biji Khorwa. At that very time a maruti car of Kaushal Bhagat was seen coming. The informant and witness Shishupal Singh came to Belhar Police Station and submitted a written report to the Officer-ln-Charge. The informant has proved the hand writing and his signature which has been marked as Exh. 1. His re-statement was taken and the informant claimed that he was in a position to identify the miscreants at the test identification parade. While the informant was deposing then he has identified these two Appellants and the informant stated that these Appellants were the persons who were responsible for throwing him into the water and at the time of occurrence they were armed with rod and knife. They were also threatening all the persons. In the next morning, seven dead bodies were recovered from the dam and those dead bodies were identified to be of Biplav Kumar Singh, Santosh Kumar, Pankaj Bhagat and others were not identified by the informant. 8. This witness was cross-examined in detail as to how he came to know about the names but, the informant clearly stated that he was not knowing the names of the accused persons but, he has identified them because they were the persons who were responsible for this occurrence. 9. Another witness P.W.1 has described the manner in which his life could be saved by others after they were thrown into the water of the dam by the accused persons on the date and time of occurrence. He stated that he proceeded from Biji Khorwa on a Rajdoot motorcycle. The motorcycle was being driven by Shankar Singh. He was sitting in the middle and Ramjee Yadav was sitting behind him. He stated that he proceeded from Biji Khorwa on a Rajdoot motorcycle. The motorcycle was being driven by Shankar Singh. He was sitting in the middle and Ramjee Yadav was sitting behind him. On another motorcycle Pappu Singh, the informant and Biplav Kumar Singh were going ahead which was being driven by Biplav Kumar Singh. He stated that after giving advance for fish to Jahur Pandit they were returning home through Badua Dam. At that very time six miscreants surrounded them near spillway. One of the criminals was armed with pistol and was of black complexion. The second was having bomb, third was armed with bow and arrow and was bearing Dhoti Kurta and fourth was appearing to be leader and he was armed with iron chain and stick of iron. The fifth criminal was having knife and sixth was having iron rod. All the miscreants caught P.W.1 and others and demanded money and other articles which were given to them. Thereafter, the accused persons snatched the lungi of Ramjee Yadav and after tearing it they tied the legs and hands of Biplav Kumar Singh and others one by one. The person armed with revolver was threatening that he would kill them. In the meanwhile, one Scooter came from west upon which three persons were present. One person was identified as Pankaj Bhagat. The miscreants started committing plundering with them on which Pankaj Bhagat replied that he has identified them upon which three-four miscreants started cutting his neck on which Sardar ordered to throw them into water upon which firstly, Biplav Kumar Singh was thrown. Then the informant was thrown and thereafter, others were thrown one by one. The depth of water was about 70 feet. This witness tried to save himself then he found the informant sitting on the platform of the pillar. This witness acknowledged that other persons were also thrown and later on dead body of Biplav Kumar Singh, Santosh Kumar Singh, Pankaj Kumar Bhagat, Om Prakash Gupta, Lalan Gupta and Krishan Kumar Sah were recovered. They anyhow managed to inform the Police. He further stated that the test identification parade was held in which he identified four miscreants out of which two, namely, the Appellants were present in the Court in course of their trial. They anyhow managed to inform the Police. He further stated that the test identification parade was held in which he identified four miscreants out of which two, namely, the Appellants were present in the Court in course of their trial. He has described that the Appellant Jabir Mian was tying them and Appellant Riyasat was threatening them and other accused persons were helping others in throwing them in the water. This witness has identified the Appellants in the jail premises and at the time of test identification parade he was the only identifying witness, Magistrate and jail authority were present. 10. P.W.13 Ramjee Yadav was also thrown into the water but he managed to save his life. He has described the occurrence, which according to him, had taken place on Monday dated 7th July, 1997 between 6.00 to 6.30 P.M when he along with Biplav Kumar Singh, Pappu Singh (P.W.3), Shishupal Singh (P.W.1) and two more persons went to village Suiya for purchasing fish. They were going on a Kawasaki motorcycle. Later on they found P.W.1 Shishupal Singh, Biplav Kumar Singh and another were sitting. These three persons accompanied him. Then they went to village Bhimadih and were going to Johari Pandit who used to rear fish. They met Johari Pandit in the way and after advancing him Rs. 150 for fish, they again started returning to their houses through the road of dam. When all the five reached near spillway the miscreants stopped them by brandishing pistol. The miscreants were five to six in numbers and they were variously armed. The miscreants looted away all the belongings of all the five persons, in the meanwhile one scooter came upon which three persons were present. One Pankaj Bhagat was identified. Those three persons were also looted. Hands and legs of all the persons were tied by the rope of lungi and they were also assaulted. At that very time a tractor carrying sand and labourers came which was stopped by the miscreants and they were also robbed of. Biplav Kumar Singh was the first person who was firstly thrown into the water and later on others were thrown one by one. This witness was also thrown in the water by the miscreants but, he anyhow untied his legs in the water and came to the platform where P.W.3 and P.W.1 were present where they came there a bit earlier. This witness was also thrown in the water by the miscreants but, he anyhow untied his legs in the water and came to the platform where P.W.3 and P.W.1 were present where they came there a bit earlier. The matter was to be reported to the Police and for that P.W.3 was requested. P.W.3 went to village Biji Khorwa and with the assistance of some others matter was reported to Police. 11. P.W.2 is a hearsay witness. P.Ws.1, 3 and 13 have stated that a tractor has come at the place of occurrence when the miscreants were preparing for throwing other persons into water. P.Ws.4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 are driver and labourers of the tractor. The driver of the tractor P.W.4 has stated that the occurrence is of four years and eight months before. These witnesses have supported the occurrence in its entirety. They have stated that many persons were looted and they were thrown into the water. 12. The inquest reports of all the dead bodies were prepared by P.W.9. He has stated that on the date and time of occurrence he prepared the inquest reports of all the dead bodies which were marked as Exh. 2 to 4 and these were signed by the witnesses which were marked as Exh. 2 to 9 and another witness of the inquest is P.W.10 and he has also stated that inquest reports were prepared in his presence. 13. P.W.14 has conducted the postmortem examination of all the seven dead bodies which were taken out from the water. 14. P.W.14 has found following injuries on the dead body of Pankaj Bhagat: 1. Bruise 1" x 1" above the left ankle 2. Fracture of mandible of both sides. 3. Whole body swelling. 4. Visceras congested. 5. Stomach contain plenty of fluids watery with food materials. 6. Froth from mouth and nostril. 7. Trachea congested. Both arms were tied behind the body with a piece of cloth and both legs were tied with a piece of cloth appears to be a lungi. Cause of death: Asphyxia due to drowning. The above, postmortem report has been marked as Exh. 4. On the dead body of Shankar Kumar Singh following finding were found by the doctor during postmortem conducted on the same day: 1. Bruise 2" x 2" below the left knee. 2. Abrasion two in number on the chin size 2" x 1/2". Cause of death: Asphyxia due to drowning. The above, postmortem report has been marked as Exh. 4. On the dead body of Shankar Kumar Singh following finding were found by the doctor during postmortem conducted on the same day: 1. Bruise 2" x 2" below the left knee. 2. Abrasion two in number on the chin size 2" x 1/2". 3. Body swollen. 4. Froth from mouth and nostril. 5. Generalized visceral congestion. 6. Stomach contained plenty of fluid watery with food material. Both the arms were tied behind the body with piece of cloth likely appears to be piece of lungi. Cause of death- Asphyxia due to drowning. Time since death within 24 hours to 48 hours. This postmortem report has been marked as Exh. 4/1. On the same day, he conducted postmortem examination on the dead body of Krishna Kumar and found the following antemortem injuries: 1. Bruise 3" x 2" on the back in the inter scapular area. 2. Bruise 1" x 1" on the dorsum of left forearm. 3. Whole body swollen. 4. Froth from mouth and nostril. 5. Trachea congested. Generalised visceral congestion. 6. Stomach contained plenty of fluid watery with food material. Both arms were tied with a piece of cloth appears like piece of lungi behind the body just above the elbow. Cause of death-Asphyxia due to drowning. Time since death within 24 hours to 48 hours. This postmortem report has been marked as Exh. 4/2. On the same day, he conducted the postmortem examination on the dead body of Biplav Kumar Singh and found the following antemortem injuries: 1. Lacerated wound 1/2"x1/2"x deep to mediastinum above the sternum. 2. Bruise 3"x2"below the left ear. 3. Bruise 2"x1" on the doresame of left hand. 4. Body swollen. 5. Froth from nostril and mouth. 6. Stomach contained plenty of fluid watery with food particles. 7. Generalised visceral congestion. Both arms were tied behind the body with a piece of cloth looking like lungi. Cause of death: Asphyxia due to drowning. Time since death within 24 hours to 48 hours. This postmortem report has been marked Exh. 4/3. On the same day, he held the postmortem examination on the dead body of Om Prakash Gupta and find the following antemortem injuries: 1. Bruise 3"x2" on the right part of forehead. 2. Whole body swollen. 3. Froth from mouth and nostril. 4. Time since death within 24 hours to 48 hours. This postmortem report has been marked Exh. 4/3. On the same day, he held the postmortem examination on the dead body of Om Prakash Gupta and find the following antemortem injuries: 1. Bruise 3"x2" on the right part of forehead. 2. Whole body swollen. 3. Froth from mouth and nostril. 4. Stomach contained plenty of watery fluid with food. 5. Trachea congested. Both the arms were tied behind the body with piece of cloth appears to be piece of lungi. Cause of death-Asphyxia due to drowning. Time since death within 24 to 48 hours. This postmortem report has been marked as Exh. 4/4. On the same day, he held the postmortem examination on the dead body of Lalan Gupta and found the following antemortem injuries: 1. Bruise 2"x2 over left Maxillary area. 2. Bruise 2"x1" over right chin of Tibia. 3. Whole body swollen. 4. Froth from mouth and nostril. 5. Stomach contained plenty of watery fluid with food materials. 6. Tachear congested. Other viscera congested. Both arms were tied behind the body with piece of cloth appears to be piece of lungi. Cause of death: Asphyxia due to drowning. Time since death 24 to 48 hours. This postmortem report has been marked as Exh. 4/5. On the same day, he conducted postmortem examination on the dead body of unknown, uncircumcised and found the following antemortem injuries: 1. Incised wound 4"x1 1/2"x2" on the left mandibuler region. 2. Fracture of mandible of both the sides. 3. Fracture of left tibial condylar region. 4. Abrasion 1 "x1" over the anterior aspect of both knee. 5. Whole body swollen. 6. Froth from mouth and nostril. 7. Stomach contained plenty of fluid watery with food. 8. Trachea congested and viscera congested. Both the arms were tied behind the body with a piece of cloth appears to be piece of lungi. Cause of death-Asphyxia due to drowning. Time since death within 24 to 48 hours. This postmortem report has been marked as Exh. 4/6. The doctor has opined that due to blockade of nose death has been caused. He has further stated that froth comes out from the mouth and nostrils due to drowning in the water, not throwing into the water after committing the murder. Time since death within 24 to 48 hours. This postmortem report has been marked as Exh. 4/6. The doctor has opined that due to blockade of nose death has been caused. He has further stated that froth comes out from the mouth and nostrils due to drowning in the water, not throwing into the water after committing the murder. 15 The doctor was of the opinion that the cause of death was ascertained by an expert board of the doctors of the locality. The Judicial Magistrates have been examined as P.Ws. 16 and 18 and they have stated that they have conducted the test identification parade in which the accused persons were identified by the witnesses. 16. Learned Counsel for the Appellants has submitted that the test identification parade was held after a long delay. The informant of the case has not given description of the accused either before the Police or in the FIR. On the basis of wrong identification, the accused persons should not have been convicted. The learned Counsel for the Appellants placed reliance upon the various Judgments reported in AIR 1973 Supreme Court 1200 Chander Singh v. State of U. P. AIR 1959 Supreme Court 484 Narain and Ors. v. State of Punjab (1972) 3 Supreme Court Cases 773 Sheikh Hasib @ Tabarak v. The State of Bihar. It is further argued that the means of identification has not been given so in view of the Judgment reported in AIR 1997 Supreme Court 2186 Kalika Tiwari and Ors. v. The State of Bihar the identification becomes doubtful then the Appellants are entitled to be given benefit of doubt. 17. From the materials available with the record it appears that the Appellants were remanded into Judicial custody in this case on 2nd September, 1997 and P.W.16 the Judicial Magistrate has stated that he has conducted test identification parade of accused Jabir Mian and Riyasat Mian on 4th September, 1997. P.W.18 another Judicial Magistrate has stated in his evidence that on 29th September, 1997 he has conducted the test identification parade of the Appellants and others. 18. In view of these summary mentioning of the dates, it appears that the delay was not abnormal and the test identification parade was conducted within reasonable time. If the manner of holding test identification parade throws suspicion then the evidence cannot be given any credence. 18. In view of these summary mentioning of the dates, it appears that the delay was not abnormal and the test identification parade was conducted within reasonable time. If the manner of holding test identification parade throws suspicion then the evidence cannot be given any credence. The purpose of conducting the test identification parade is that the identity of the accused must be proved without reasonable doubt. The accused must be put on test identification parade as soon as possible but, the delay varies from one case to another. Test identification parade held long after the incident have no value and if the witnesses have a clear image of the accused in their minds then it is clear that they can identify him correctly at the identification parade. 19. In the present case, the remand of the Appellants was on 2nd September, 1997 and the test identification parades were on 4th September, 1997 and 29th September, 1997. This delay was not of such magnitude which can render test identification parade useless and mala fide. Therefore, I am of the view that there was no abnormal delay in conducting the test identification parade. 20. With regard to identification of the Appellants, P.W.3 has stated in Paragraph 15 of his examination-in-chief that he in his re-statement has stated that he can identify the accused persons by face. He has given detailed version about the look of the accused persons to the investigating officer. At the time of occurrence the informant was not knowing the name of the accused persons. Therefore, in his cross-examination he has stated that for the first time he has seen the accused persons at the time of occurrence at the place of occurrence. Similarly P.W.1 has stated that he has identified the accused persons inside the jail premises in presence of jail authorities and the Magistrate. Similarly P.W.4 another victim of the offence has identified the Appellants at test identification parade which was conducted in the presence of the Magistrate. 21. After considering the every aspects of the matter, it appears that the identification of the accused in the light of the tractor which came at the place of occurrence at the time of occurrence and also in view of the statements of some of the witnesses that it was lightening, it is clear that the witnesses have identified the Appellants and they have made correct identification. Accordingly, I am of the view that the Prosecution was able to prove charge against the Appellants under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code beyond all reasonable doubts and conviction Order passed by the Trial Court needs no interference. 22. On the question of sentence, it has been submitted that the Appellants have remained in custody since long from 1997 and so period of sentence may be modified to the extent that period undergone by them should be deemed to be sufficient for the ends of justice. 23. In the present case, the Appellants and others have looted away the belongings of the informant and nine others and thereafter, they have thrown the informant and other victims into the water from spillway bridge as a result thereof seven persons have died and three persons any how managed to save their life. Considering the seriousness of the occurrence, I am not inclined to modify the sentence awarded to the Appellants by the learned Trial Court. 24. In the result, this appeal is held to be without merit and it is dismissed accordingly. 25. I agree.