Judgment :- 1. The petitioners have passed +2 examination, that was conducted in March 2010. They have applied for M.B.B.S. course to the Secretary, Selection Committee, the third respondent herein for the year 2010 - 2011. The petitioners were not considered for selection to M.B.B.S. course on the ground that they were born on 03.01.1994 and 08.01.1994 respectively and that they have not completed 17 years of age as on 31.12.2010. The non consideration of the petitioners are as per the Clause 4 of the Prospectus. As per this Clause, the candidate should have completed 17 years of age as on 31st December of the year in which the admission to M.B.B.S., course is made. Admittedly, the petitioners are not qualified to make an application, in view of the aforesaid Clause in the Prospectus. 2. In these circumstances, the petitioners have filed these writ petitions praying for declaration to declare that Clause 4 of the General Instructions in the Prospectus issued by the third respondent for admission to M.B.B.S/B.D.S Course for the year 2010-2011 as unconstitutional and ultravires and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioners case for admission to M.B.B.S/B.D.S Course for the year 2010-2011 without reference to Clause 4 of the General Instructions given in the Prospectus issued by the third respondent for the year 2010-2011 and select them for admission if they are otherwise eligible for such admission. 3. Notice of Motion was ordered on 08.06.2010 4. Heard Mr. R. Singgaravelan, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. G. Sankaran, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 4 and Ms. Jannavi Raghuraman, learned counsel for the fifth respondent. 5. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 33 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) the Medical Council of India made the regulations called the "Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997". G. Sankaran, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 4 and Ms. Jannavi Raghuraman, learned counsel for the fifth respondent. 5. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 33 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (102 of 1956) the Medical Council of India made the regulations called the "Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997". Regulation 4(1) that is relevant for the present case is extracted here-under:- "Admission to the Medical Course – Eligibility Criteria: No Candidate shall be allowed to be admitted to the Medical Curriculum of first Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surger (MBBS) Course until: (1) He / she shall complete the age of 17 years on or before 31st December, of the year admission to the MBBS Course." Therefore, Clause 4 of the Prospectus questioned in these writ petitions is based on the Regulation 4(1) of the Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997 framed by the Medical Council of India. The Regulations are statutory in force and the Regulation 4 (1) of the Regulations is not challenged. 6. In an identical situation, this Court in W.P.No.12531 of 2009 on 05.08.2009 (Akil Kannan Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu & others) dismissed the writ petition holding that the statutory regulation was not challenged in the writ petition. As stated above, in this case, the Regulation is not questioned. 7. In view of the Regulation mentioned above and in view of the judgment in W.P.No.12531 of 2009 (referred to above), these writ petitions have no merit and the same are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.