JUDGEMENT 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. The Bihar Control Order 2001 notified on 20.2.2007, Clause-7 dealing with suspension/cancellation of license has come up for consideration before this Court in more than one writ application such as C.W.J.C. No. 6966 of 2008 and C.W.J.C. No. 14703 of 2009. Considering the power of suspension /cancellation and incorporation of the new provisions, vis-a-vis the earlier Bihar Trade Article (Licenses Unification) Order, 1984, this Court has held that the control order of 2001 visualizes suspension and cancellation of licence as two different punishments. As distinct from the suspension of a licence pursuant to the institution of a First Information Report, it has been held by this Court that once a licence has been suspended and action as required under Rules has been taken after a show cause -notice, the licence shall remain under suspension for 90 days. Once the punishment of suspension has been resorted to the authority cannot proceed to cancel the licence as that shall amount to double punishment which was not permissible in law. 3. The license of the petitioner having been suspended and not cancelled on 24.6.2009, he having filed his reply, the period of 90 days having long expired, the continued suspension of his license is therefore not permissible under Clause 7(5). 4. The respondents are directed to resume supplies to the petitioner as his suspension has lost its statutory effect. The writ application stands allowed.