Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2010 DIGILAW 2587 (MAD)

R. Palanisamy v. Ansal Mishra

2010-06-29

M.JAICHANDREN

body2010
Judgment 1. This contempt petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to punish the respondent for deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court, on 3.12.2008, in W.P.No28643 of 2008. 2. This Court had passed an order, on 3.12.2008, in W.P.No.28643 of 2008, directing the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 10.11.2008, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, if it had not been disposed of till the date of the said order. 3. From the typed set of papers filed on behalf of the petitioner it is seen that the petitioner had sent a representation, only on 7.10.2009, and a legal notice had been issued by the petitioners counsel, on 7.12.2009. On receipt of the legal notice issued on behalf of the petitioner the first respondent had issued proceedings, dated 11.1.2010. 4. In such circumstances, this Court does not find that the allegation of the petitioner that the first respondent had wilfully disobeyed the order passed by this Court, on 3.12.2008, cannot be sustained. Hence, the contempt petition stands closed. No costs.