Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2010 DIGILAW 280 (RAJ)
Hari Narayan v. Babu Lal
2010-02-03
SHUBHRA SINGH
body2010
Jherh flag] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh vUrxZr /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e fo:) vkKk lgk;d dysDVj] t;iqj fnukad 26-2-2007 ds izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 us ,d nkok ckcr bUnzkt deh] jdck iwfrZ] ?kks"k.kk o LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk dk lgk;d dysDVj] t;iqj ds ;gka izLrqr fd;kA nkos esa dgk x;k fd fookfnr Hkwfe dk oknh o izfroknh la[;k 1 ds firk ds caVokjk gks x;k Fkk o ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 289 Lohdkj dj dqy 4 ch?kk 19 fcLok Hkwfe fd'ku pUn ds uke vkbZ] ijUrq jktLo fjdkMZ esa vizkFkhZ ds gd esa 0-17 gSDVs;j de vafdr dj nh xbZ o izfroknh@vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 o 2 esa 0-22 gSDVs;j vf/kd vafdr dj nh xbZA nkSjkus okn fuxjkuhdkj@vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls ,d izkFkZuk i= Hkwfe uerh gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;kA ftlesa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vius vkns'k fnukad 26-2-2007 }kjk [kkfjt dj fn;kA mDr vkns'k ds fo:) ;g fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 3- geus vf/koDrkvksa dh cgl lquhA 4- viuh cgl esa fo}ku vf/koDrk fuxjkuhdrkZ us Li"V fd;k fd muds }kjk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k fuosnu fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZx.k ds ikl de Hkwfe gS ,oa vklikl ds [kkrsnkjksa dh Hkwfe ugj esa tkus okyh ukfy;ksa o uki-tksd esa xbZ] ftlls jdck de gqvk gSA vr% ekSds ij lEiw.kZ Hkwfe dk uki-tksd djok;k tkosA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us ;g dgrs gq, fujLr dj fn;k fd mDr fjdkMZ ds ek/;e ls fuxjkuhdrkZ vius i{k esa lk{; nk;j djuk pkgrs gSa tks fd fof/k fo:) gS vr% ekSdk deh'uj dh fjiksVZ eaxok;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ugha gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk dk ;g Hkh dFku Fkk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us mudh eU'kk le>us esa xyrh dh gS D;ksafd nq:Lrh ds iwoZ Hkwfe dh uikbZ vko';d gS vkSj blls jdcs ckcr dksbZ lk{; [kM+k ugha fd;k tk ldrkA fo}ku vf/koDrk us vius i{k esa vkjvkjMh 1983 ist 88] vkjvkjMh 1996 ist 78] vkj,yMCY;w 1988 okY;qe-1 ist 225 dks m)`r fd;kA 5- viuh cgl esa fo}ku vf/koDrk xSj fuxjkdkj us dgk fd pwafd nkok fjdkMZ nq:Lrh dk gS u fd lhek fookn dkA vr% ekSdk deh'uj dh fjiksVZ dk izdj.k esa dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA nkos esa lk{; cUn gks pqdh gS rFkk nkok vfUre cgl esa yxk gSA vkjvkjVh 2007 okY;qe 2 ist 943 % vkj-,y-MCY;w- 2007¼2½ vkjts 1030 dks m)`r djrs gq, fo}ku vf/koDrk us dgk fd deh'uj ds ek/;e ls lk{; tek ugha dh tk ldrhA vr% v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vkns'k fof/klEer gksus ds dkj.k fuxjkuh [kkfjt QjekbZ tkosA 6- geus fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dh cgl lquh o i=koyh dk xaHkhjrk iwoZd v/;;u fd;kA 7- rF;ksa ds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd nkok nq:Lrh bUnzkt deh] jdck dh iwfrZ] ?kks"k.kk ,oa LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk ckcr nk;j fd;k x;k gSA nkos esa lhek fookn dk dksbZ fcUnq gksuk izrhr ugha gksrk tcfd vf/koDrk fuxjkuhdrkZ }kjk tks fof/kd n`"VkUr izLrqr fd;k gS og lhek fookn ds lUnHkZ esa ykxw gksrk gSA vr% mDr fof/kd n`"VkUr orZeku izdj.k esa pLik ugha gksrh gSA vkjvkjVh 2007 okY;qe 2 ist 943 ¼fd'ku I;kjh o vU; cuke xksiky izlkn½ dks ;gka m)`r fd;k tkrk gS& Code of Civil Procedure, 1908—Order 26, Rule 9 Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955—Sec. 212—Appointment of Commissioner—Application rejected Parties claiming cultivatory possession over land in Question & Patol — Commissioner cannot give report regarding possession — Non-petitioners recorded khatedar as per jamabandi of Svt.
2059 & petitioners suit is for declaration — Summoning mauka report amounts to collection of evidence — Burden of proof is on plaintiff—Held, Order is justified & confirmed. mijksDrkuqlkj Li"V gS fd deh'uj dh fjiksVZ ,sls ekeyksa esa eaxok;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA pwafd izdj.k fjiksVZ nq:Lrh dk gSA vr% bl ifjis{; esa deh'uj ls ekSdk fjiksVZ ds ek/;e ls fuxjkuhdrkZ D;k fl) djuk pkgrs gSa] ;g Li"V ugha gSA 8- mijksDr foospu ds vuqlkj vihyk/khu vkns'k fnukad 26-2-2007 esa ge dksbZ fof/kd =qfV ugha ikrs gq, izLrqr fuxjkuh dks lkjghu gksus ds dkj.k [kkfjt Qjekrs gSaA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2010 DIGILAW 280 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]