Judgment :- 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying that this Court may be pleased to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court, on 3.2.2010, in W.P.No.1900 of 2010. 2. On 3.2.2010, this Court had directed the first respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 28.1.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as well as to the second respondent, as expeditiously as possible, not later than twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order. 3. At this stage of the hearing of the contempt petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had placed before this Court, the proceedings of the respondent, dated 9.6.2010, stating that the order passed by this Court, on 3.2.2010, in W.P.No.1900 of 2010, had been complied with. 4. However, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the proceedings of the respondent, dated 9.6.2010, had not been communicated to the petitioner, till date. 5. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that the contempt petition had been filed prematurely, even before the time granted by this Court, by its order, dated 3.2.2010, had expired. 6. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondent, and in view of the proceedings of the respondent, dated 9.6.2010, placed before this Court, this Court is of the considered view that no further orders are necessary in the present contempt petition. Hence, the contempt petition stands closed.