Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2010 DIGILAW 2973 (MAD)

G. S. Chandra Sekaren v. The Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram

2010-07-21

D.HARIPARANTHAMAN

body2010
Judgment :- 1. Heard Mr.Rathina Asohan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mrs.Lita Srinivasan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the first and second respondents and Mr.M.Devaraj, learned counsel for the third respondent. 2. The land of the petitioner in Survey Nos.301/1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Pondur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District to an extent of 2.95 acres was acquired under the Land Acquisition Act. He seeks a direction to the respondents to pay the differential compensation as per the Common order dated 30.11.2009 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Appeal A.S.Nos.331 to 371 of 2008. It is admitted that the Appeals referred to above are not relating to the acquisition of land in Survey Numbers in issue. Hence, the petitioner cannot claim compensation based on the order of the Appeal. Furthermore, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he sought a reference to the Sub-Court relating to compensation as he was not satisfied with the quantum. It is also stated that the reference is pending before the competent Sub-Court. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, there is no merit in the writ petition and accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.