Research › Search › Judgment

Karnataka High Court · body

2010 DIGILAW 301 (KAR)

Paul Mathulla, Bangalore v. Govt of Karnataka, Reptd. , by its Princial Secretary, Higher Education, Bangalore

2010-03-08

S.ABDUL NAZEER

body2010
Judgment :- The Principal of Impact Polytechnic, Sahakaranagar, Kodigehalli, Bangalore has filed this petition seeking direction to the respondents to release the amount due towards salary of the staff of the said institution under the grant-in-aid scheme. 2. The respondents have filed statement of objections contending that the respondents have released the grant in excess what was due to the institution. It is further contended that the institution has not reimbursed 50% of the tuition fee collected from the students as per the Grant-respondents to recover the aforesaid amount from the petitioner. 3. Smt. Sona Vakkund, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the State Government has deposited the Grant-in-aid and also agreed to enhance the grant from 85% to 100% towards salary of the staff of the institution. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. 4. Learned AGA submits that he has no objection for the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. However, liberty may be reserved for the respondents to recover the excess amount released by the respondents to the petitioner-institution and also to recover the other amount due by the petitioner to the respondents. 5. The memo filed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner is placed on record and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is hereby clarified that if the petitioner is due any amount to the respondents on any account, they may recover the same in accordance with law. No costs.