Amitava Lala, J.: - Petitioners' contention before us is that the matter is not like other usual matters where the Court has been called upon unnecessarily to interfere in the election matters after is­suance of notification of the election dated 16.9.2010, and before the last date of com­pletion of election and notification thereto. It is a very special case in which the elec­toral role of the petitioner has been rejected during the period of notification by the ap­propriate authority for which appeal lies to the authority concerned as per Rule 21-A of U.P. Panchayat Raj (Registration of Elec­tors) Rules, 1994 and an appeal has already been made which is pending for due con­sideration and its disposal. 2. It has been pointed out on behalf of respondent Election Commission that it can be corrected, provided the last date of making nomination for election in the Gram Panchayat is completed and in such case it will not be done before the comple­tion of the election. To that extent he relied upon section 5 of U.P. Panchayat Raj (Registration of Electors) Supplementary Provisions Order, 1999. 3. Factually, nomination is to be filed in the fourth phase and till now no question of last date of filing nomination has come forward. 4. We have also gone through the scope of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 and find that there is a provision under section 9 (10) (b) of the said Act for the cor­rection of any existing entry in the electoral roll on the application of the elector con­cerned. Therefore, composite meaning of all the provisions referred above speak that since the last date of nomination is not complete and the order was passed during the period of notification and an appeal is pending, the same is required to be heard as expeditiously as possible but not beyond a period of seven days from the date of communication of this order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the above observation and order, however, without imposing any cost. Sanjay Misra, J. - I agree. Petition Disposed of.