Judgment : This Criminal Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.128 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Giddalur. The brief facts of the case are that the marriage of the second respondent herein was performed with the petitioner. The father of the second respondent presented an amount of Rs.1,25,000/- to A-1 to A-3 i.e., the petitioner and his parents towards dowry and other expenses. It is alleged that after marriage, when the second respondent gave birth to a female child, the Accused started harassing her on the ground that she gave birth to a female child. The petitioner is alleged to have harassed the second respondent physically and mentally at the instigation of the other Accused. On the complaint lodged by the second respondent, the police registered a case in Crime No.16 of 2006 and after completing the investigation, laid the charge sheet. The only point that arises for consideration is whether the allegations in the complaint are absurd and inherently improbable and whether no prima facie case has been made out. It is the settled law that while exercising the jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the High Court would not embark upon any enquiry whether the allegations in the complaint are likely to be established by evidence or not. The High Court would be guided by the allegations where those allegations set out in the complaint or the charge sheet do not, in law, constitute or spell out any offence and that resort criminal proceedings of injustice would amount in the abuse of process of the Court of law. There is nothing on record to say that the allegations set out in the charge sheet do not constitute an offence. Therefore, I hold that there are no grounds to quash the proceedings against the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.