Judgment :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to take action against the second respondent, who is running a hosiery goods manufacturing factory in the premises of the second respondent temple, without obtaining the necessary licence, as per law. 3. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner, in the present writ petition, is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 7.9.2009, is directed to be disposed of by the first respondent, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first and the second respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties concerned, the first respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 7.9.2009, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as well as to the second respondent, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the first respondent a copy of the representation, dated 7.9.2009, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed.