M/s. Shri Mahalakshmi Metel and Scrap Processing (P) Ltd. Chennai Rep. by its Director Arun Kumar Sharma v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission Chennai Rep. By its Secretary & Others
2010-09-02
M.JAICHANDREN
body2010
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- Heard Mr.K.Seshadri, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Selvendran, the learned counsel appearing for the second and the third respondents. 2. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal. 3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 8.1.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the second and the third respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 8.1.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 8.1.2010, to the third respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.