Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2010 DIGILAW 397 (MAD)

Abdul Kalam Proprietor, Babu Trading Company, Coimbatore & Others v. The Commissioner of Municipal Administration Ezhilagam, Chennai & Others

2010-01-29

M.JAICHANDREN

body2010
Judgment :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsels appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 18.12.2009, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 18.12.2009, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation dated 18.12.2009, to the second respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.