JUDGMENT Satya Poot Mehrotra and Kashi Nath Pandey, JJ.—Heard Shri I. N. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for quashing the order of suspension dated 3/10.12.2009 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition). 3. It appears that this Court passed an order dated 4.9.2009 disposing of Writ Petition No. 47191 of 2009. Copy of the said order of this Court has been filed as Annexure-13 to the writ petition. By the said order, this Court, inter alia, directed that the plot in question shall at once be entered in the name of Gaon Sabha. This Court, inter alia, further directed that “the Collector shall recommend to the appropriate authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the C.O.” 4. It appears that pursuant to the said direction given by this Court, disciplinary proceedings are contemplated against the petitioner herein. By the aforesaid order dated 3/10.12.2009, the petitioner has been placed under suspension in contemplation of inquiry. 5. A perusal of the suspension order shows that the same contains brief indication of the charges/ allegations against the petitioner. In our view, in case the said charges/ allegations are established, the same may entail imposition of major penalty against the petitioner. 6. In the circumstances, we are of the opinion that no illegality has been committed by the respondent No. 2 in passing the aforesaid order of suspension against the petitioner. 7. The writ petition lacks merits, and the same is liable to be dismissed. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. 8. It is, however, observed that the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner will be completed expeditiously, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before the concerned authority. The petitioner will co-operate in the disciplinary proceedings.