Chairman/Manager v. Umesh kumar Radheshyam Brahmbhatt
2010-10-01
M.R.SHAH
body2010
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : M.R. Shah, J. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for appropriate writ, order and/or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 8/10/2003 passed by the Appellate Industrial Court, Nadiad in Appeal (ICN) No.9 of 2002, by which the appellate court has partly allowed the said appeal directing the petitioner herein to reinstate the respondent workman as a Clerk with continuity of service but without back-wages or other monetary benefits. Though served nobody appears on behalf of the respondent workman. 2. It appears from the affidavit filed by the petitioner dated 179/2008 that the respondent shall not be interested in the present litigation, as he is already working in the Income Department and is gainfully employed and he might not be interested in appointment as a Clerk in the petitioner Bank. 3. Having heard Mr.Gadhia, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and considering the judgment and order dated 31/7/2001 passed by the Labour Court, Nadiad in T-Application No. 9 of 1992 as well as the order dated 8/10/2003 passed by the Appellate Industrial Court, Nadiad in Appeal (ICN) No. 9 of 2002, it appears that the appointment of the respondent as a Clerk was a training, initially for a period of six months, which was extended for a further period of six months and that thereafter on completion of training period, he was relieved. 4. Considering the above the case squarely falls within section 2(oo)(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Under the circumstances, the Industrial Court has materially erred in allowing the appeal preferred by the respondent workman and directing the petitioner employer to reinstate the respondent workman on the post of Clerk with continuity of service. 5. In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, present petition succeeds. The impugned order dated 8/10/2003 passed by the Appellate Industrial Court, Nadiad in Appeal (ICN) No. 9 of 2002 is hereby quashed and set aside and the judgment and order dated 31/7/2001 passed by the Labour Court, Nadiad in T-Application No.9 of 1992 is hereby restored. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. Petition Allowed.