JUDGMENT 1. - This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner Rohit Singh in FIR No. 72/2010 registered at Police Station Sadar, Jaipur for the offence under Section 392 IPC. 2. Brief facts of the case are that complainant Himanshu lodged report on 20.2.2010 and alleged that he along with his wife was coming on scooter, the Indica car hit them and occupants beat them and snatched Rs. 1500/- from his pocket. He and his wife were inflicted injuries. Out of them Gauri @ Rohit Singh was arrested on the spot and rest of them ran away. On this report, case under Section 392 IPC was registered. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that nothing was recovered from the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated, hence he may be enlarged on bail whereas learned Public Prosecutor opposed bail application. 5. As per report, other accused persons ran away, nothing has been recovered from the petitioner and as per injury report Himanshu sustained two simple injuries and Sandhya felt pain on her body. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I deem it proper to allow application of the petitioner. 6. Therefore, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Rohit Singh son of Narayan may be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- with .one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court on usual conditions and shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date of earing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.Bail Application Allowed. *******