JUDGMENT Heard. This writ petition has been filed against the order dated 25.3.2009, passed by learned Sub Judge-II, Daltonganj in Title Suit No. 109 of 2002, allowing the amendment by adding two new persons as parties to the suit. Mr. Rohit Roy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that admittedly in 2004 itself, the plaintiff knew that two persons were appointed as Directors of Company but such amendment was made at the fag end of the trial. It appears that the court concerned has allowed the prayer for adding the said Directors as parties on the ground that for just decision of the case, the above two persons should be added as parties. The learned court below has allowed cost also, though nominal. In the circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order in exercise of my supervisory power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, the suit may be decided expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments to the parties, preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With these observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.