Research › Search › Judgment

Jharkhand High Court · body

2010 DIGILAW 51 (JHR)

Dashrath Prasad Yadav v. State of Jharkhand

2010-01-08

R.K.MERATHIA

body2010
JUDGMENT Heard. Mr. Waris, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that case of petitioner is fully covered by the Full Bench Judgment, reported in 2005(3) JLJR 38 Ram Prasad Singh and analogous cases, affirmed by the Supreme Court. He further submitted that similarly situated persons in Drinking Water & Sanitation Department has been given similar benefits in terms of the Full Bench Judgment. Counsel for the State submitted that it is to be verified whether petitioner's case is fully covered or not. In the circumstances, petitioner is permitted to make a representation before the Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi( Respondent no. 4). If he finds that petitioner's case is fully covered by the case of Ram Prasad Singh ( supra), he will pass orders for regularization of service of the petitioner. However, if he finds that petitioner's case is not fully covered by the said judgment, he will communicate the reasons thereof to the petitioner. This exercise should be completed within six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. With these observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.