JUDGMENT Dev Darshan Sud, J.(Oral)-Actual date notice was issued to the respondent. The notice has been received back after service. No body appears on his behalf. 2. The State of Himachal Pradesh challenges the order passed by the Tribunal in Original Application No. 2599 of 2003, Sh. Tilak Raj Vs. State of H.P. and others. The operative part of the order reads:- “In view of this position respondents are directed to give work charged status to the applicant after completion of 10 years of service with 240 days in each calendar year in a particular status in which the applicant has worked for more days within a period of six months from the date f this order. The arrears as payable to the applicant by virtue of giving him/her the work charged status is to be paid to him/her within three months from the date of granting him/her work charged status”. 3. A Review Petition 53/07 instituted by the State against this Judgment was dismissed on 1.6.2007:- “In view of decision rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in State of Himachal Pradesh and others Vs. Gehar Singh (Civil Appeal No. 1037 of 2007), decided on 27.2.2007, the review petition has become infructuous, as such, the same is dismissed as infructuous”. 4. While disposing of the petition the Tribunal holds:- “…….In the present case neither the question of regularizing the applicant on permanent basis of confirming him/her as is done in case of regularly appointed employees nor regularization in regular service has been claimed. In the instant case the claim is for giving work charged status to the applicant as per the judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhaya’s case (supra). Hence in the absence of any stay order or suspension of the operation of the judgment in Mool Raj Upadhaya’s case (supra) the further proceedings in the present Original Application cannot be stayed. Therefore, the submission for staying further proceedings in the instant case is not allowed………. ……….In view of this position respondents are directed to give work charged status to the applicant after completion of 10 years of service with 240 days in each calendar year in a particular status in which the applicant has worked for more days within a period of six months from the date of this order. ……….In view of this position respondents are directed to give work charged status to the applicant after completion of 10 years of service with 240 days in each calendar year in a particular status in which the applicant has worked for more days within a period of six months from the date of this order. The arrears as payable to the applicant by virtue of giving him/her the work charged status is to be paid to him/her within three months from the date of granting him/her work charged status. Original application stands finally disposed of with no order as to costs”. 5. The factual situation having not been denied before the Tribunal, we do not see any reason to interfere in this petition. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the directions by the Tribunal is for granting work charged status to the respondent against the post of Electrician Grade-I. This point has been urged in the pleadings but we find no mention of the same in the order. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. There is no order as to costs. All the interim order(s) stand vacated. Learned Additional Advocate General urges certain subsequent events whereby the services of the respondent have been regularized. We need not to give any findings on that point.