Judgment Smt. Abhilasha Kumari, J.—Rule. Mr. D.C. Sejpal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent “State of Gujarat. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the respective parties, the application is being heard and finally decided, today. 2. This application has been filed with a prayer to delete/modify conditions Nos. 7 (d) and 7(e) in order dated 7.5.2009 rendered in Criminal Misc. Application No. 5397/2009. The applicant had filed the above-mentioned application for grant of bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in connection with offences registered vide F.I.R. being C.R. No. I-180 of 2008, registered with Kodinar Police Station, under Sections 498-A, 306, 304-B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court had granted bail to the applicant by imposing certain conditions, and the relevant two conditions are reproduced as under : “7. d) shall mark his presence before the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station on the 15th and 30th of every English calendar month, between 10:00 am and 5:00 pm, till the commencement of the trial. e) shall not leave the local limits of the State of Gujarat without the prior permission of the concerned Sessions Judge;” 3. I have heard Mr. Yash N. Nanavaty, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr. D.C. Sejpal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Gujarat. 4. It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the applicant that the parents of the applicant are aged about 59 and 46 years, respectively, and as the trial has not yet commenced, he is facing hardships by remaining present before the investigating officer, twice a month as directed. It is further submitted that considering the age of the parents of the applicant as well as health problems suffered by them, condition No. 7(d) may kindly be deleted/ modified. Insofar as condition No. 7(e) is concerned, it is submitted that father of the applicant is suffering from heart disease, therefore, the said condition may also be deleted/modified. 5. Mr. D.C. Sejpal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the deletion of the above two conditions on the ground that the same were accepted by the applicant at the time of grant of bail. 6. 5. Mr. D.C. Sejpal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the deletion of the above two conditions on the ground that the same were accepted by the applicant at the time of grant of bail. 6. I have heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties and considered the submissions made at the Bar as well as averments made in the application. 7. By condition No. 7(d), the applicant is required to mark his presence twice a month, as stipulated, at the concerned police station. In case the applicant is facing some difficulty due to age or health reasons of his parents, this condition can be modified to the extent that he shall mark his presence once a month before the concerned Police Station; but in the considered view of this Court, deletion of the condition would not be appropriate, as bail has been granted to the applicant only subject to certain conditions. Insofar as condition No. 7(e) is concerned, this Court does not find that there is any justification for deletion of the same, therefore, the prayer made by the applicant regarding condition No. 7(e) cannot be accepted. Accordingly, the following order is passed : Condition No. 7(d) is modified as under : “7. d) shall mark his presence before the Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station between 1st and 7th of every English calendar month, between 10:00 am and 5:00 pm, till the commencement of the trial” The prayer made for deletion/modification of condition No. 7(e) is rejected. The application is partly-allowed, as above. Rule is made absolute, to the above extent. P P P P P