ih- pUnz] lnL;-&izkFkhZ us ;g utjlkuh dk izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 229 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ds rgr v/kksgLrk{kjdrkZ }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 6-8-2009 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr fd;k gSA 2- ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k us utjlkuh izkFkZu i= esa mYysf[kr rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq, eq[; :i ls dFku fd;k fd ekuuh; U;k;ky; us fcuk fdlh vk/kkj ds izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh dks [kkfjt dj Hkkjh dkuwuh ,oa fl)kfUrd Hkwy dh gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd /kkjk 251 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds vUrxZr dsoy ,sls jkLrs ds fo"k; esa gh fu.kZ; gks ldrk gS tks dVku ds u gksa vfirq dk'rdkjksa }kjk muds dk'r dh Hkwfe ds vkokxeu ds mi;ksx vkrs gksaA fjdkMsZM jkLrs dh ck/kk gVkus dk mDr /kkjk 251 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e esa dksbZ izko/kku ugha gS blfy, jktLo U;k;ky;ksa dks izLrqr izdj.k dk Jo.kkf/kdkj {ks=kf/kdkj u gksrs gq, xyr :i ls vkns'k ikfjr fd;s x;s gSa ftldks vkyksP; fu.kZ; ls cgky j[kdj dkuwuh =qfV dh x;h gSA vr% utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= dks Lohdkj dj vkyksP; fu.kZ; dks fujLr djus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA 3- eSaus ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr cgl ij euu fd;k rFkk utjlkuh ;kfpdk esa mYysf[kr vk{ksiksa ij xaHkhjrkiwoZd fopkj fd;k gSA lkFk gh vkyksP; fu.kZ; dk Hkh /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k gSA 4- eSa loZizFke fdlh Hkh ekeys ds iqufoZyksdu djus ls lacaf/kr ewyHkwr dkwuu dk mYys[k djuk mfpr le>rk gwaA bl lEcU/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us lqjsUnz dqekj odhy cuke phQ ,T;wD;wfVo vkfQlj e/; izns'k 2005¼1½ vkjvkjVh ist 545 ds fofu.kZ; esa izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& "A point that has been heard and decided cannot form a ground for review even if assuming that the view taken in the judgment under review is erroneous." dUgS;kyky lSuh cuke LVsV vkQ jktLFkku 2005 vkjchts ¼12½ ist 290 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us izfrikfnr fd;k gS fd& "The scope of review is very limited. It has been clearly held in a catena of cases that a judgment order may be open to review u/O. 47 R.I. CPC if there is a mistake or an error aparent on the face of record. An error which is not self evident and has to be detected by the process of reasoning can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the face of record justifying exercise of power of review. An error which is not self evident and has to be detected by the process of reasoning can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the face of record justifying exercise of power of review. In exercise of jurisdiction u/O. 47 R.I. CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be re-heard and corrected. There is clearly distinction between `an erroneous decision' and `an error apparent on the face of record.' While the former can be corrected by higher forum, the latter can be corrected by exercise of review jurisdiction. A review petition has therefore, a limited purpose and cannot be allowed to be an appeal in disguise." 5- mijksDr ewyHkwr fl)kUrksa dks e/; utj j[krs gq, tc eSaus v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ds lkFk lkFk v/kksgLrk{kjdrkZ }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 6-8-2009 dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k gS rks eSa ikrk gwa fd v/kksgLrk{kjdrkZ us v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa vkns'k ,oa vfHkopuksa dh fof/k lEer rkjhds ls leh{kk dj tks rdZiw.kZ vkyksR; fu.kZ; fnukad 6-8-09 dks ikfjr fd;k gS mlesa ,slh dksbZ tkfgjk =qfV ^^error apparent on the face of record** gksuk izrhr ugha gksrk gS ftl dkj.k ls eSa mDr fu.kZ; dks vikLr dj u;k fu.kZ; ikfjr djuk mfpr ugha le>rk gwaA mijksDr dkuwuh ,oa rF;kRed ifjis{; esa izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= dks xzg.krk dh LVst ij gh vLohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; le>rk gwaA 6- ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr utjlkuh ;kfpdk dks vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA