Judgment :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the respondent is directed to consider the objections raised by the petitioner, in his representation, dated 20.02.2010, and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a specified time. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner had expressed the apprehension that the respondent would also disconnect the electricity service connection, bearing S.C.No.1284,standing in the name of the owner of the premises in question, based on the impugned notice, dated, 16.02.2010 issued by the respondent. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that the service connection, in S.C.No.1284 would not be disconnected, based on the impugned notice of the first respondent, dated, 16.02.2010, which relates to the electricity service connection, in respect of S.C.No.1243, at 37/B, Panipoondar Street, Vriddhachalam. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties concerned, the respondent is directed to consider the objections raised by the petitioner, in his representation, dated, 20.02.2010, and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. At the time of hearing, it would be open to the petitioner, to raise further objections, if any,within a period of four weeks, from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. This Writ Petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.