JUDGEMENT Navin Sinha and D. K. Singh and jj. JJ. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants. None appears for the respondents. The panel in respect of which the controversy arises appears to have been prepared in the year 1997. 2. No appointment from that panel is permissible in law at this stage as that itself violates Article 14 of the constitution of India. 3. With the aforesaid modification, the appeal stands disposed off.