Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2010 DIGILAW 954 (SC)

T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India

2010-09-06

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, R.M.LODHA, SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR

body2010
JUDGMENT : 1. We find no merit in these interlocutory applications. The same are accordingly, dismissed. W.P. (C) No. 193 of 2008 2. The Writ Petitioner may file a proper application before the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Respondent No. 2 herein) requesting him to consider for change of place of Saw Mill No. 407 from Gureliya Bazar Raipur Chhattisgarh to Balaudabazar Raipur. The application to be so filed shall be considered and disposed of by the Respondent No. 2 within eight weeks from the date of filing of such application. 3. The Writ Petition is accordingly, disposed of. Civil Appeal No. 7467/2010 Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 26056/2010 (C.C. No. 12541 of 2007) 4. Delay condoned. 5. Leave granted. 6. This appeal is disposed of in terms of this Court's Order dated 29th February, 2008 made in I.A. No. 1797 in W.P. (C) No. 202 of 1995. 7. It is stated by learned counsel for the respondent-NCL Industries Limited that the respondent had already complied with the direction to deposit certain amounts and accordingly, deposited an amount of Rs. 30 lacs (Rupees thirty lacs only) on 24th September, 2008 for the purpose of granting ex-post facto permission for establishment of MDF/Particle Board plant and for composite plant for the manufacture of MDF and Particle Board respectively. The appellant shall verify and if it is found that the amount has already been deposited by the respondent the necessary licenses may accordingly, be granted. 8. This appeal is accordingly, disposed of.