Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1001 (MAD)

B. Jothi Arunachalam v. The Regional Transport Authority Tirupur Region Tirupur

2011-02-28

M.JAICHANDREN

body2011
JUDGMENT : 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the respondent, with regard to the reliefs sought for in the present writ petition, and if the respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on merits, within a specified time, as fixed by this Court. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the respondent, as prayed for, within a period of fifteen days from today, and on such representation being submitted, the respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks thereafter. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.