JUDGMENT 1. - This order governs the disposal of bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the applicant Mani Ram @ Munna Ram pertaining to FIR No.468/2010 of Police Station Nagaur for the offence under section 8/15 (c) NDPS Act and section 476 and 411 IPC. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant as also the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material available on record. 3. According to the prosecution, on 22.09.2010 during police patrolling the police party stopped vehicle bearing No.RJ-14/UB-3304 but the driver of the vehicle ran away and two persons sitting at the front seat of the vehicle disclosed their name as Mani Ram and Jagdish and also disclosed the name of the driver as Chimna Ram. 4. On search of the vehicle five plastic bags were found, out of which four plastic bags contained 40 kgs. of doda post each and in the fifth bag 42 kgs. of doda post were found and in total 202 Kgs. of doda post were recovered from the vehicle and the vehicle was seized. The accused Mani Ram was arrested and FIR No. 468/2010 was registered against him. 5. The applicant filed bail application under section 439 Cr.P.C before the court of Addl.Sessions Judge, Nagaur stating that no recovery of any incriminating piece of evidence has been recovered from him to connect him with the recovery of doda post recovered from the aforesaid vehicle and in fact , the applicant, at the relevant time was just standing near the vehicle when the police party stopped the vehicle in question. The learned Addl.Sessions Judge, vide its order dated 30.03.3011, rejected the bail application. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Nagaur ,the applicant has preferred this Cri. Misc. Bail application. 6. Learned counsel for the applicant canvassed that the applicant has been falsely implicated and is in no way connected with the commission of the offence, as such, he may be granted indulgence of bail. 7. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 8. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and carefully perused the relevant material available on record, it is noticed that the accusations as levelled against the applicant does not seem to be false, groundless and baseless. It is not a fit case wherein, the applicant can be granted bail. 9. 7. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 8. Having considered the submissions made at the bar and carefully perused the relevant material available on record, it is noticed that the accusations as levelled against the applicant does not seem to be false, groundless and baseless. It is not a fit case wherein, the applicant can be granted bail. 9. Accordingly, the bail application filed under section 439 Cr.P.C. stands dismissed.Application Dismissed. *******