JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel. 2. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 31/1/2011, whereby, the learned court below has allowed the application under Order 9, Rule 13 CPC filed by the defendant Nani w/o Badri for setting aside the ex-parte decree dated 6/10/2006 passed in civil suit No. 20/2006 (Deva Ram & anr. v. Nani w/o Badri). 3. Learned trial court in the impugned order has found that during the pendency of the application under Order 9, Rule 13 CPC, an application was got filed by the defendant Nani on 13/11/2007, an illiterate lady, that on account of compromise, she does not want to pursue the application under Order 9, Rule 13 but later on filed an application that said application for compromise was filed by misleading her and obtaining her signature/giving thumb impression on the paper, contents of which were not known to her. In these circumstances, the learned trial court set aside the ex-parte decree and allowed the application filed by the defendant. 4. Having heard the learned counsel, this Court is of the opinion that the learned trial court has given cogent reasons for allowing the said application, which require no interference by this Court in the present revision petition. 5. Accordingly, the present revision petition, being devoid of merit, is hereby dismissed. Copy of the order be sent to the opposite side forthwith.Revision Dismissed. *******