JUDGMENT It appears that on account of injury sustained by the respondent No.3 in an incident, the respondent No.3 filed a Claim Petition under the Motor Vehicles Act being Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 370 of 2005, wherein the United India Insurance Company Ltd. (respondent No.4) and the petitioner, as owner of the Truck in question, were impleaded as the opposite parties. By the award dated 14-07-2010, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bareilly partly allowed the said Claim Petition and awarded an amount of Rs. 2,50,000/- as against the petitioner being the owner of the Truck in question. 2. The petitioner filed an application dated 11-04-2011 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bareilly for setting-aside the said award dated 14-07-2010 and for hearing the aforesaid Claim Petition on merits. The said application is stated to be pending before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bareilly. 3. In the meantime, recovery proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner by the respondent No.3 for recovering the amount awarded under the aforesaid award dated 14-07-2010. The Citation dated 25th March, 2011 (Annexure 4 to the Writ Petition) has been issued in this regard. 4. The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition, inter-alia, praying for quashing the said Recovery Citation dated 25th March, 2011. 5. We have heard Sri B.A. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the Writ Petition and Annexures thereto. 6. The petitioner has already filed an application before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bareilly for setting-aside the award dated 14-07-2010 and for hearing the Claim Petition on merits. Moreover, the petitioner has remedy of filing Appeal before this Court against the award dated 14-07-2010. 7. In view of the above, we are not inclined to interfere in the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the present case. 8. The Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed, and the same is accordingly dismissed.