JUDGMENT 1. - In this writ petition, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that although the controversy involved in this case was adjudicated in Shivlal Pancharia's case in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8301/2008 and the special appeal arising therefrom has also been dismissed by the Division Bench, therefore, compliance order was issued on 16.07.2009, whereby, the Vice Chancellor of the Rajasthan Agriculture University, Bikaner ordered for granting Selection scale of Junior Mechanic on completion of 9 years, Senior Mechanic on completion of 18 years and Foreman on completing service of 27 years to the Drives. But, unfortunately, due to arbitrary action of the Registrar of the University, order was passed on 06.10.2009 by which it is ordered that the benefit is only available to the writ petitioners in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8301/2008, therefore, order dated 26.10,2009 deserves to be quashed. 2. But, unfortunately, due to arbitrary action of the Registrar of the University, order was passed on 06.10.2009 by which it is ordered that the benefit is only available to the writ petitioners in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8301/2008, therefore, order dated 26.10,2009 deserves to be quashed. 2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, I have carefully scanned the material on record including order dated 16.07.2009 passed by the Vice Chancellor in compliance of the directions issued by this Court in the writ petition No. 8301/2008 Order dated 16.07.2009 reads as under : " jktLFkku d`f"k fo'ofo|ky;] chdkusj " dzekad i0 631@ld`fo@LFkk0@xzqi&2@2009@278 fnukad 16-7-2009 vkns'k ;g gS fd okgu pkydkas }kjk p;fur osrueku ds rgr 9 o"kZ dh lsok iw.kZ djus ij twuf;j eSdsfud] 18 o"kZ dh lsok iw.kZ djus ij lhfu;j eSdsfud rFkk 27 o"kZ dh lsok iw.kZ djus ij QksjeSu ds in dk osrueku nsus dh ekax dks ysdj ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky;] tks/kiqj esa ,l0ch0 flfoy fjV fifV'ku la[;k 8301@2008 f'koyky iapkfj;k o vU; cuke ld`fo nk;j dhA ;g fd ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us mDr ;kfpdk dks vius vkns'k fnukad 14-5-2009 }kjk fuf.kZr djrs gq, ;g ?kksf"kr fd;k fd oknhx.k 9 o"kZ dh lsok iw.kZ djus ij twfu;j eSdsfud] 18 o"kZ dh lsok iw.kZ djus ij lhfu;j eSdsfud rFkkk 27 o"kZ dh lsok iw.kZ djus ij QkSjesu ds in dk osrueku izkIr djus ds gdnkj gSA ;g fd fu.kZ; dk ijh{k.k fd;k x;kA fo'ofo|ky; dls v'kS{kf.kd deZpkfj;ksa ds fu;qfDr vkSj inksUufr fu;e esa okgu pkydksa dh inksUufr pSuy okgu&pkyd ls tfu;j eSdsfud] twfu;j eSdsfud ls lhfu;j eSdsfud rFkk lhfu;j eSdsfud ls QkSjeSu ds in ij gSA fo'ofo|ky; ds vkns'k dzekad i613@LFkk0 ld`fo@xzqi&2@2008@2438 fnukad 20-6-2008 ds }kjk xfBr desVh us viuh vuq'kalk esa okgu pkydks dks 9 o"kZ dh lsok ij twfu;j eSdsfud] 18 o"kZ dh lsok ij lhfu;j eSdsfud rFkk 27 o"kZ dh lsok ij QkSjeSu dk osrueku nsus dh vuq'kalk dh FkhA ;g fd fo'ofo|ky; vf/koDrk us Hkh mijksDr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij [k.MihB esa vihy nk;j djus ij viuh vlgefr iznku dhA ;g fd mijksDr rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ekuuh; dqyifr egksn; izlUu gksdj ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; vuqlkj okgu pkydksa dks 9 o"kksZ dh lsok iw.kZ djus ij twfu;j eSdsfud] 18 o"kZ dh lsok iw.kZ djus ij lhfu;j eSdsfud rFkk 27 o"kZ dh lsok iw.kZ djus ij QkSjeSu ds in dk p;fur osrueku nsus ds vkns'k iznku djrs gSA ,l0Mh0@& dqy lfpo " 3. In my opinion, after unambiguous decision having been taken by the Vice Chancellor for the compliance of directions issued by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8301/2008, the aforesaid order .of the Vice Chancellor was to be applied for all drivers in the University. The Registrar of the University while applying arbitrary interpretation has wrongly denied said benefit be the petitioner and passed the following order : " Lokeh ds'kokuUn " jktLFkku d`f"k fo'ofo|ky;] chdkusj dzekad i631@jkd`fo@LFkk0@xzqi&2@2009@592 fnukad 26-10-2009 vkns'k ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; fnukad 14-5-2009 dh ikyuk esa izlkfjr vkns'k dzekad i631@jkd`fo@LFkk0@xzqi&2@2009@278 fnukad 16-7-2009 dh fujUrjrk esa okgu pkydksa dks 09] 18 ,oa 27 o"kZ dh lsok iw.kZ djus ij desVh dh fjiksVZ esa vafdrkuqlkj osrueku ns; gksxsaA mDr osrueku mUgha okgu pkydksa dks ns; gksaxs] tks fjV esa 'kkfey gSA desVh dh fjiksVZ fnukad 26-7-2008 ,oa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; fnukad 14-5-2009 dh izfr layXu gSA lgh@& dqy lfpo " 4. Such type of order as passed by the Registrar is not only contempt of the order passed by the Court but is also totally arbitrary action on the part of the Registrar because order dated 16.07.2009 is very specific and there is no decision taken by the Vice Chancellor to extend the benefit only to the writ petitioners of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8301/2008. 5. This writ petition is accordingly allowed. Order impugned dated 26.10.2009, Annex.-lO to the writ petition is hereby quashed and set aside. The respondent University is directed to comply with the order dated 16.07.2009 passed in pursuance of the adjudication made by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8301/2008 and grant benefit of selection scale to the petitioner as per judgment of this Court and compliance order passed by the Vice Chancellor, Rajasthan Agriculture University, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the Registrar of the respondent University is directed to pay Rs. 3,000/- as cost to the petitioner for passing impugned order dated 16.07.2009 in contravention of the judgment of this Court from his personal pocket.Petition allowed. *******