High Court Legal Aid Committee At Patna v. State Of Bihar
2011-07-01
BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA, R.M.DOSHIT
body2011
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGEMENT R.M.Doshit, J. 1. This Petition has been initiated suo motu by the High Court through the High Court Legal Aid Committee pursuant to the direction dated 5th September 1995 issued by the Honble Supreme Court in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 505 of 1994. On perusal of the record it appears that some complaint was made by one Sheela Barse before the Honble Supreme Court. She wrote a letter to the then Honble the Chief Justice of India in respect of the conditions of women inmates locked up in Presidency Jail Kolkata. She alleged that mentally challenged women without any criminal background were illegally incarcerated in Presidency Jail at Kolkata. On the basis of the said letter the Honble Supreme Court initiated a public interest litigation in Writ petition (Criminal) No. 237 of 1989. The said petition was disposed of on 17th August 1993 [ (1993) 4 SCC 204 , Sheela Barse vs. Union of India and another ] . Under the said order, the Honble Supreme Court appointed a pair of commissioners to carry out the directions issued by the Honble Court in respect of the jails in West Bengal. We emphasize that the said matter arose in respect of the Presidency Jail at Kolkata, particularly in support of the non-criminal, mentally challenged women illegally incarcerated in the jail. 2. Following the said direction, under order dated 5th September, 1995 made in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 505 of 1994, the monitoring of the implementation of the several orders made by the Honble Court was made over to the High Courts. Detailed directions were issued to the registry of the Supreme Court to make out copies of the orders made in the proceedings from time to time to be forwarded to each High Court. The High Courts were requested to take up the matter in Public Interest through respective High Court Legal Aid Committee. In the said order it was specifically mentioned that "The High Court shall also be free to pass such other and further orders as may be found necessary or appropriate to protect and improve the conditions obtaining in places where women and Children- not accused or convicted of any crime- are detained." Pursuant to the above order, this High Court initiated the present Public Interest Litigation.
On perusal of the various orders made from time to time, it appears that the scope of the enquiry was enlarged to (i) persons who are mentally ill, (ii) Female inmates of the jail and (iii) Juveniles. Over the years, several orders are made and counter- affidavits are filed to apprise the Court in connection with the conditions prevailing in the jails in the State of Bihar. The matter has not been taken up since the year 2002. 3. It does appear that the conditions in the jails in the State of Bihar are far from satisfactory. Overcrowding and lack of sanitation and hygiene are major problems. Under the orders of the High Court the State Government has commenced construction to augment the existing facilities in the jail, of course far from being adequate. Nothing has come on record that any man or woman without criminal background or any mentally challenged person without criminal background is incarcerated in any of the jails in the State of Bihar. Besides, on enactment of the Protection of the Human Rights Act, 1993, the State Human Rights Commission has been appointed. In view of Section 29 read with section 12 of the said Act of 1993, the State Human Rights Commission is empowered, inter alia, to inspect the jails in the State of Bihar, illegal detention etc. 4. We may also note that pending this petition, the Parliament has enacted the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000. Section 4 of the said Act provides for establishment of Juvenile Justice Board especially for juveniles in conflict with law. In our opinion, the concern voiced by the Honble Supreme Court and by this Court in respect of the mentally challenged women incarcerated in the jails and of juvenile offenders is properly taken care of by the above referred two enactments. 5. A further affidavit has been filed today to indicate that the State Government has taken sincere action to augment the capacity of the jails in the State of Bihar to provide for Juvenile barrack, hospital cell, Administrative building in the jails of the Bihar State. The said affidavit also indicates that no woman or a child who is neither an accused nor a convict has been detained in any jail.
The said affidavit also indicates that no woman or a child who is neither an accused nor a convict has been detained in any jail. In above view of the matter, we are of the opinion that now that the State Government has taken up to update the jails in the State of Bihar and that the interest of women, juvenile offenders and the inmates of the jails is protected by the aforesaid Acts of 1993 and 2000, there is no need to continue to monitor the conditions in the jails in the State of Bihar through this public interest proceeding. We, therefore, close this proceeding. 6. The petition stands disposed of.