Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1269 (ALL)

Bharosa v. State Of U. P.

2011-05-19

JAYASHREE TIWARI, SATYA POOT MEHROTRA

body2011
JUDGMENT The present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner, inter-alia, praying for quashing the recovery citation dated 29th March, 2010 (Annexure 2 to the Writ Petition). Further prayer has been made that the respondents-authorities be directed to give benefit of one-time settlement to the petitioner. 2. By the order dated 20th April, 2011, time was granted to Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 to obtain instructions in the matter. Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 states that the instructions have since been received by him. Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh states that as per the instructions, the petitioner took two loans from the respondent no. 4. One loan bearing Account No. B.D. 14/10 was taken by the petitioner for business of tent house. The other loan bearing Account No. B.D. 14/11 was taken for the dairy business. 3. Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh further states that as per the instructions, an amount of Rs. 82,328/- is due from the petitioner as on 31st May, 2011 in respect of the aforesaid loan taken for the business of tent house. Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh further states that as per the instructions, an amount of Rs. 1,65,590/- is due from the petitioner as on 31st May, 2011 in respect of the loan taken for the dairy business. Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh further states that citation dated 29th March, 2011 (Annexure 2 to the Writ Petition) has been issued in respect of the loan taken for dairy business. Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh further states that as regards, the loan taken for the business of tent house, the petitioner may approach the respondent no. 4 for one-time settlement and such settlement may be made by making deposit of Rs. 63,010/- by 30th June, 2011. Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh further states that as regards, the loan taken for dairy business, the petitioner may approach the respondent no. 4 for one-time settlement and such settlement may be made by making deposit of Rs. 1,20,985/- by 30th June, 2011. 4. As the petitioner is willing to make one-time settlement with the respondent no. 4 in respect of the loans taken by the petitioner, it is open to the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 4 by making the aforesaid deposits by 30th June, 2011 for one-time settlement. 5. 1,20,985/- by 30th June, 2011. 4. As the petitioner is willing to make one-time settlement with the respondent no. 4 in respect of the loans taken by the petitioner, it is open to the petitioner to approach the respondent no. 4 by making the aforesaid deposits by 30th June, 2011 for one-time settlement. 5. In the circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed in the present Writ Petition. The Writ Petitioner stands disposed of accordingly.