Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1295 (MAD)

V. P. Arumugan v. District Collector, Coimbatore

2011-03-08

M.JAICHANDREN

body2011
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 13.3.2006, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 13.3.2006, if it had not been disposed of till date, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 13.3.2006, to the respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.