Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1312 (HP)

Tek Chand Shandil v. H. P. S. E. B.

2011-03-16

RAJIV SHARMA

body2011
JUDGMENT Rajiv Sharma, J. Petitioner has already made a representation for the redressal of his grievance. The same has been decided by the Secretary of the respondent-Board, without passing a speaking/detailed order, on 27th December, 2004. Once the representation has been made by the petitioner, the same ought to have been decided by passing a speaking order, after taking into consideration all the grounds/pleas taken in the representation. 2. Consequently, the present petition is allowed. Annexure A-16, dated 27th December, 2004 is quashed and set aside. The Secretary of the respondent-Board is directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner afresh, by passing a speaking order, within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of the judgment by the petitioner. The petitioner shall be heard in person and for that purpose, the date shall be notified to him separately.