JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, C.J. The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure P-2, which is a communication issued by the third respondent. It is difficult to comprehend the submissions of the petitioner that this Court should issue a writ against the private respondent No. 3. The vehement contention of the petitioner is that Annexure P-2 is in violation of scheme (Annexure P-1). It is further pointed out that the petitioner is a member of the Society and hence, she is entitled to all the privileges and benefits being rendered to the other members of the Society. Necessarily hence she has to invoke the remedies as provided under the H.P. Co-operative Societies Act. If her civil rights have been affected, she has to approach the Civil Court. If she has a case that the scheme is not enforced, she has to approach the competent authority, who has to implement the scheme. Therefore, without prejudice to the liberty to the petitioner to work out any such relief, the writ petition is dismissed. The gracious submission of the learned senior counsel that Annexure P-2 shall not be implemented for the next ten days in order to enable the petitioner to work out her remedy before appropriate forum, is recorded. 2. With the above observations, the writ petition stands dismissed, so also the pending application(s), if any. The interim order, if any, stands vacated.