Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1388 (HP)

Prabh Dayal v. State of H. P.

2011-03-17

KURIAN JOSEPH, V.K.AHUJA

body2011
JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, C.J. The writ petitions are filed mainly with the following prayer: “(i) That appropriate writ, order or direction may kindly be issued and the respondent Department may be directed to regularize/confer work charge status to the petitioner after completion of 8 years of daily wage service with all consequential benefits in view of the judgment rendered by this Hon’ble Court.” 2. The petitioners claim regularization/work charge status on completion of eight years of continuous service as daily wagers. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No.2735 of 2010, Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment, referred above by the petitioner concerned. 3. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.