Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1446 (HP)

Rajinder Kumar v. State of H. P.

2011-03-18

KURIAN JOSEPH, V.K.AHUJA

body2011
JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioners claim work charge status, arrears, pension and other consequential benefits from the date they completed eight years of service. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court dated 28th July, 2010 rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, titled Rakesh Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others. The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioners may file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the second respondent within a period of one month from today. The second respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioner concerned will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation(s). 2. With the above observations, the writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application(s) if any.