Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1480 (MAD)

A. Abusali, Proprietor Asia Enterprises Chennai v. Assistant Commissioner (CT), Chennai

2011-03-16

M.JAICHANDREN

body2011
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Tax), appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to re-submit the applications, dated 03.11.2010, in Form A, under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, as well as Central Sales Tax Act, to the respondent and if the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass orders, as per Section 39 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. 3. The learned Government Advocate (Tax) appearing for the respondent has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the respondent, the petitioner is directed to re-submit the applications in question to the respondent within a period of ten days from today and on such re-submission of the applications, by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, as per Section 39 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, within a period of two weeks thereafter, after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. 5. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs.