JUDGMENT Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. The petitioner is aggrieved since ad hoc service rendered by the petitioner, followed by the regular service, is not counted for the purpose of eligible service benefits. It is submitted that the issue is covered in favour of the petitioner by the decision of this Court rendered in Paras Ram Vs. State of H.P., which has been implemented by the State. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed as follows. 2. There will be a direction to the second respondent to examine the case of the petitioner and in case the petitioner is similarly situated, as the petitioner referred to in the case above, the petitioner herein also will be given the similar and eligible benefits. Needful in this behalf shall be done by the second respondent within a period of two months on the production of the copy of this judgment alongwith the copy of the Writ Petition. 3. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.