Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1499 (MAD)

S. Umamaheswari v. Executive Officer, Suriyampalayam Panchayat, Erode

2011-03-16

R.SUDHAKAR

body2011
Judgment :- 1. Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records in respect of the notice of the respondent vide Na.Ka.No.37/2011 dated 18.2.2011 and quash the same and consequently forbearing the respondent, their men and subordinates from interfering with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land having Plot No.35, in R.S.No.35 in R.S.No.269/1 of Suriyampalayam Village, Erode Taluk & District. 2. Mrs.R.Anitha, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. The writ petitioner challenges the impugned notice dated 18.2.2011 issued by the respondent calling upon the petitioner not to construct the building in violation of law in the property belonging to the panchayat. According to the petitioner, she is constructing building as per approved plan and there is no violation of law. 4. Since the impugned proceedings is in the nature of notice, petitioner is given liberty to give reply to the notice along with a representation to the respondent. On receipt of reply and representation, the respondent shall consider the reply and the representation on its own merits and proceed strictly in accordance with law. 5. The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.