Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1508 (MAD)

D. Leelavathy v. Director of Medical Education

2011-03-17

M.JAICHANDREN

body2011
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for taxes, appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4 and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the fifth respondent, with regard to the refund of income tax deducted at source by the first respondent and if the fifth respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on the petitioner submitting the relevant records, including the returns filed by the petitioner. 3. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents have no objection for this Court passing such an order. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the fifth respondent, with regard to the refund of income tax deducted at source by the first respondent, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on receipt of such representation, the fifth respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a period of eight weeks thereafter, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.