Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 151 (HP)

Tape Ram v. State of H. P.

2011-01-05

KURIAN JOSEPH, V.K.AHUJA

body2011
JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That the respondents may be ordered to grant work charge status to the petitioner from the dates they completed 10 years of service with all the benefits incidental thereof such as full back wages, seniority and pay fixation etc.” 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the case is squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in Mool Raj Upadhyaya vs. State of H.P., 1994 Supp. (2) SCC 316. Therefore, it is for the petitioners to approach the first respondent within a period of one month, in which case the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent in the light of the judgment, referred to above and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken within another four months from the date of receipt of the representation(s) along with a copy of this judgment and the copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner concerned. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.