JUDGMENT Justice Kurian Joseph, C.J. These writ petitions are filed with the identical prayers, one set of such prayers is as under: “i) That the respondents may be ordered to grant work charge status to the petitioner(s) from the due date in terms of Mool Raj Upadhayay vrs. State of H.P. and as per the law laid down in Phool Maya vrs. State of H.P. with all the benefits incidental thereof such as full back wages, seniority and pay fixation etc.” 2. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the decision of this Court in Phool Maya vs. State of H.P. (CWP(T) No. 10220 of 2008, decided on 17.3.2010). But, the facts have to be verified in each case. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of as follows:- It will be open to the petitioners to file an individual representation before the 2nd/3rd respondent along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above, within a period of two months from today, in which case the matter will be examined on facts and in light of the decision, referred to above, and appropriate action will be taken in the matter within another four months. All the pending applications also stand disposed of.